PEACE AND ORDER
With the completion of the evacuation of remains from the Dutch
military cemetery in Jogjakarta on June 14th, there is nothing to
prevent the immediate restoration of the Republican Government.
However, the Netherlands delegation, while agreeing that a cease-
hostilities order will only be issued after the Republican
Government is returned to Jogjakarta, is clinging to the argument
that there must be a published agreement, regarding the terms of
the order and its implementation, before the restoration.
2. On the other hand the Republicans point out that this argument
is not supported by any of the documents, and that the Republican
delegation has from the outset consistently maintained, in
conformity with Security Council opinion, that decisions could
only be taken after their Government has assembled freely.
Republicans have also, quite reasonably, pointed out that to
decide on the cease-hostilities agreement now and thus present
their Government and the TNI with a fait accompli would seriously
weaken the position of the Republican leaders and greatly reduce
the chances of implementing an agreement.
3. For some time it appeared as if a deadlock would ensue.
Although the matter has not been discussed formally, I feel sure
that the Commission (at least by a majority) would support the
Republican position. Van Royen is aware of this. Consequently, he
has been ready to look for a compromise but has been embarrassed
by the die-hard views of the army and some of the civilian
advisers (such as Gieben). The latter have been quick to argue
that the failure of the TNI officers to come to Batavia
exemplifies the lack of control by Republican leaders over the
army. In my opinion this argument is not justified. The TNI will
not take part in the negotiations until the Republican Government
is operating freely in Jogjakarta and regular consultation between
the Government and the TNI command is possible. For example,
Simatupang undoubtedly feels that, particularly in view of his
leading part in the TNI evacuations after Renville, he should not
take an individual responsibility for the cease-hostilities
agreement now. If the TNI are properly consulted before an
agreement, and if the agreement adequately safeguards the
existence of the TNI, there should be no major problem between the
army and the Government. General Sudirman has as good as said as
much in a private letter to President Sukarno. As late as 17 June
the Netherlands delegation has officially stated that Republican
military advisers will be free to wear their uniforms in
travelling to Batavia and during their sojourn in the town. This
is clearly designed to defend the delegation against any charges
of responsibility for delay.
4. As I mentioned in my telegram No. K.317 [1], Van Royen has also
been concerned at the task of explaining to the Netherlands
Government why (contrary to their expectations) there will be no
agreement prior to the restoration of the Republic in Jogjakarta.
It is surprising that the Netherlands Government should have been
misled on this point.
5. It was to help Van Royen that Cochran made his compromise
proposal that Hatta should write a personal letter to Van Royen
confirming the principles included in the three cease-hostilities
documents already agreed upon by the delegations. The Republican
delegation is not opposed to the compromise and is consulting
Sukarno and Hatta at Bangka today. Meanwhile Van Royen is
explaining the situation and seeking instructions from The Hague.
6. Incidentally, the Netherlands army authorities made a typical
effort to create further difficulties on the cease-hostilities
documents. On military advice the Netherlands delegation submitted
on Wednesday evening, 15 June, revised drafts of the three
documents. Revisions proposed for the cease-hostilities order and
the proclamation, which mainly stressed cooperation for the
maintenance for peace and order, were reasonable and have been
incorporated in a modified form. However, the revisions proposed
for the regulations for the implementation of the cease-
hostilities agreement (attachment I [2]), were entirely
unacceptable to the Republican delegation and the Commission. In
any event, the unsatisfactory sections of these proposed revisions
have been thrown out and only minor amendments accepted. It might
be reasonably conjectured that Van Royen only submitted the
revised drafts to appease the military advisers and Gieben.
7. In view of the decisive stage reached I am enclosing with this
letter a complete set of the latest documents ( Attachment II
[3]). These are: