Skip to main content

Historical documents

375 Critchley to Department of External Affairs

Cablegram K305 BATAVIA, 4 May 1949, 2.15 p.m.

IMMEDIATE CONFIDENTIAL

I have talked to Cochran about his recent unilateral activities.

[1] He explains that he originally helped the parties to get
together at their request, and did not intend to break into their
informal talks. Towards the end of last week, however, they came
to him for help and discussed with him their points of difficulty.

At these meetings he made suggestions based upon the various views
expressed, but he does not consider that he has advanced what
could be called an American draft.

2. Cochran also says that:-

(a) He told Roem that he would urge the Netherlands acceptance of
the Republican demand for the restoration to the whole of the
Residency of Djokjakarta, although he could not agree that this
was required by the 23rd March directive. [2]

(b) In presenting the Republican drafts to Van Royen, he stressed
that the Republican Delegation has been pushed as far as it could
go and urged Netherlands acceptance.

(c) When he received the Netherlands response, (see my telegram
K.304 [3]), he told Van Royen the revisions would be unacceptable
to the Republican Delegation and subsequent exchanges generated
some heat.

3. Cochran is clearly shaken by the latest Netherlands response
and promises to bring further pressure on Van Royen.

1 Critchley's dissatisfaction with Cochran's handling of the
Dutch-Republican negotiations was the cause of some tension
between the two members of the Commission. Van Roijen
reported to Van Maarseveen on 19 April Cochran's observation that
Critchley was 'more Republican than the Republicans' and Stikker
commented to Michiels van Verduynen on 23 April that, since
Critchley's conversation with Chifley and Burton in Singapore,
Critchley was more 'intractable' than ever, with the result that
Cochran was beginning to have 'quite enough' of him. Burton
supported Critchley's position in London telling Dening that, if
the Batavia discussion did not produce results within a fixed
time, Australia would raise a 'hullabaloo' in the UN General
Assembly. See Rijks Geschiedkundige Publicatien, Officiele
Bescheiden Betreffende de Nederlands-Indonesische Betrekkingen
1945-1950, vol. 18 The Hague 1993, pp.410, 448 and 458.

2 See Document 312.

3 Document 374.


[AA : A1838, 403/2/3/2, iv]
Last Updated: 11 September 2013
Back to top