Skip to main content

Historical documents

57 Australian Government to Addison

Cablegram 118 CANBERRA, 14 May 1947

IMMEDIATE TOP SECRET

Your D.171. Australian Defence Committee has considered proposal
of armaments truce and makes the following observations.

The Defence Forces of Australia are at this time at a low ebb.

Demobilisation of the war-time forces has just been completed. The
post-war forces are still under consideration and have not yet
been approved by the Government. It therefore follows that this
country is at present unable to fulfil her part of her publicly
expressed policy with regard to international security which
entails the provision of forces as follows:-

Future defence policy will be governed by the forces to be placed
at the disposal of the United Nations for the maintenance of
international peace and security, including regional arrangements
in the Pacific, the forces to be maintained by Australia under
arrangements for co-operation in Empire Defence, and the forces to
be maintained by Australia to provide for self-defence.

We note the consideration being given by the United Kingdom to
proposals for an armaments truce. If truce were now agreed upon
Australia would not be permitted to constitute the forces
necessary for her own protection and would remain virtually
defenceless. The measures now in train to remedy the present
position would be deferred for the duration of the truce. Should
the truce be broken Australia would be at a major disadvantage.

From the Australian defence point of view an armaments truce by
all nations at this stage is quite unacceptable. Should a truce be
confined to the five major powers, we consider it would not be
effective until a practical system of exchange of information and
verification could be instituted. Further, certain major powers
have other powers so closely associated with them that unless the
truce were also applied to the associated powers it would be
ineffective.

Further to our 85, Defence Committee consider that the willingness
of Member Nations to publish information on armed forces and agree
to a system of verification of such information will encourage
international confidence, and, at the same time constitute a
practical step towards disarmament.

Despite much talk, the Disarmament Commission achieved little
during 1947 with most western powers tending to the view that only
political successes would create a confident milieu in which
disarmament would be possible, and with the Soviet Union arguing
on the contrary that international confidence would follow actual
steps in disarmament. Indeed, when the General Assembly met later
in the year, Dr Evatt, while allowing that disarmament proposals
were important, feared that they distracted people from the UN's
main objectives: a system of conciliation and arbitration to
prevent war; the economic betterment of mankind. [1]

1 See Document 1.


[AA : A1838, 539/1/2]
Last Updated: 11 September 2013
Back to top