When I last met Dr. Evatt on September 2nd at the French Legation
I mentioned to him that I had gladly complied with his request,
formulated on the previous day, to send a personal message on his
behalf to The Hague.

This message conveyed his congratulations on the occasion of the
anniversary of H.M. The Queen's Birthday and further expressed Dr.

Evart's desire to renew, during his stay in the United States, his
Paris contacts [1] with Baron van Boetzelaer. Dr. Evatt felt that
a full and frank discussion with my Foreign Minister, should he
lead our delegation to the U.N.O., might be helpful towards a
solution of the various difficulties all of which your Minister
considered might easily be disposed of.

In referring you to the letter which I sent to the Right Hon. The
Prime Minister dated the 3rd instant [2], which I assume has by
now come to your notice, I believe I have given you a complete
background of the conversation.

I arranged with Dr. Evatt that any reply which would be received
in answer to my message would be passed on to you personally. He
assured me that you would see to its further and safe
transmission.

I therefore would ask you to be good enough to communicate to Dr.

Evatt by cable, firstly that the Netherlands Government
appreciates the congratulations which the Minister interpreted
[3]; and secondly that Baron van Boetzelaer to his regret most
probably will not be able to proceed to New York but that he
trusts that Dr. Evatt will frankly discuss the various questions
with Dr. H. van Roijen, Netherlands Ambassador at Ottawa (who will
be in New York) and whose acquaintance Dr. Evatt made at San
Francisco in 1945.

If I may be allowed to strike a personal note I would be
particularly grateful if you were to add and convey on my own
behalf that I am convinced that nothing would be more heartily
welcomed by my Government than an early improvement in our
relations with Australia. These relations, as you undoubtedly
realise yourself, suffered a further setback as a result of the
rather impetuous attitude of the Australian representative at the
Security Council. For the moment it looked as if the situation
might be further aggravated by the somewhat tactless approach of
Mr. Eaton [4], which now however happily belongs to the past.

I still believe that if we can join hands on the boycott question
[5] and continue our efforts to terminate what is becoming a
chronic disease all will be well between us.

May I ask you to acknowledge receipt of this letter and to confirm
to me that the message of my Government has been conveyed to Dr.

Evatt.