About this publication

Australia and WTO dispute settlement

Monthly Bulletin
July 2005

In this issue


Australia as a Complainant

European Communities: Export Subsidies on Sugar (WT/DS265/AB/R)

Australia, Brazil, Thailand and the EC have been in negotiations to agree on a reasonable period of time for the EC to implement the WTO ruling.  The Appellate Body and Panel Reports in this dispute were adopted by the DSB in May.  The Appellate Body upheld Australia’s (and Brazil’s and Thailand’s) challenge to the European Communities’ (EC) sugar export subsidies, ruling that, consistent with its WTO obligations on agricultural export subsidies, the EC must significantly limit its subsidised exports of sugar and reduce its annual expenditure on export subsidies. 

European Communities: Protection of Trademarks and Geographical Indications for Agricultural Products and Foodstuffs (WT/DS290/R)

No new developments.  Following adoption of the Panel Report in April, Australia and the United States (in respect of the parallel US challenge to the same European Communities (EC) measure) have agreed that the EC may have until 3 April 2006 to implement the Panel’s findings.

Australia as a Respondent

Australia: Certain Measures Affecting the Importation of Fresh Fruit and Vegetables (WT/DS270)

No new developments.  (A panel was established in August 2003 but has not yet been composed.)

Australia: Certain Measures Affecting the Importation of Fresh Pineapple Fruit (WT/DS/271)

No new developments.  (Consultations were held in November 2002 at the request of the Philippines, but no panel has been established.) 

Australia: Quarantine Regime for Imports (WT/DS287)

No new developments. (A panel was established in November 2003 but has not yet been composed.)

Australia as a Third Party: Selected Disputes

Japan: Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples (WT/DS245)

The Panel’s Report on the United States’ recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU in this dispute was adopted at the regular DSB meeting on 20 July.

European Communities:  Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (WT/DS291, 292 and 293)

No new developments. 

United States/Canada: Continued Suspension of Obligations in the EC Hormones Dispute (WT/DS320 and WT/DS321)

Panels were established at the February DSB meeting at the request of the EC in these two separate but related disputes.  The Panels in the disputes have agreed to the parties’ requests to open their proceedings to observation by other WTO Members and the public.  Given that some of the third parties objected to this request with regard to the session for third party submissions to the panel, that part of the proceedings will remain closed.  The disputes relate to the legitimacy of the continued retaliation by the United States and Canada, despite European Communities claims of compliance with the findings in the EC – Hormones disputes.  Australia has joined both disputes as a third party.

United States: Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations” (WT/DS108)

An oral hearing into the dispute, and subsequent Panel questions, took place in early July, following composition of a panel in May.  This dispute relates to a request of the European Communities (in a second recourse to DSU Article 21.5) to examine the consistency of US measures replacing FSC export subsidy measures relating to agriculture and manufactured products previously found to be WTO inconsistent.  Australia has joined the dispute as a third party, as have Brazil and China. 

European Communities: Selected Customs Matters (WT/DS315)

A panel was composed in May to examine United States’ concerns that the European Communities customs law is applied in a non-uniform manner and that the EC does not maintain a forum for the prompt review and correction of administrative action relating to customs matters.  Australia has joined the dispute as a third party, as have Argentina, Brazil, China, Hong Kong - China, India, Japan, Korea, and Chinese Taipei

European Communities and Certain Member States/United States:  Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (WT/DS316 and WT/DS317)

The DSB on 20 July established two panels to examine, respectively, the United States’ complaint on the European Communities’ subsidies to Airbus, and the European Communities’ complaint regarding United States subsidies to Boeing.  Australia has joined the dispute as a third party, together with Brazil, Canada, China, Japan and Korea.

Meetings of the Dispute Settlement Body

DSB Meeting: 20 July 2005

The DSB established panels in the United States’ and European Communities’ parallel challenges to each other’s subsidies to large civil aircraft.  Australia was one of six Members to reserve third party rights at the meeting.  A panel was also established at Pakistan’s request to consider Egyptian anti-dumping duties on matches.  The compliance panel report in Japan: Measures Affecting the Importation of Apples was adopted, as were the Appellate Body and Panel reports in United States: Countervailing Duty Investigation on Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors (DRAMS) from Korea.

The next regular DSB Meeting will be held on 31 August 2005.

WTO Dispute Settlement: Developments of Interest

The following reports were circulated in June, and are available on the WTO website:

[More bulletins]