Description
The International Organisations and Legal Division administers
this sub-program through the Legal Branch. The division’s area of responsibility
also includes one Australian overseas post: New York UN.
| Table
25 |
International Legal Interests (1.8) Resources Summary |
| |
1997-98 Actual ($’000)
|
1998-99 Budget ($’000)
|
1998-99 Budget and Additional Estimates ($’000)
|
1998-99 Actual ($’000)
|
|
Appropriations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Running costs
|
6 006
|
9 391
|
9 481
|
7 344
|
|
Other program costs
|
149
|
311
|
670
|
587
|
|
Total appropriations
|
6 155
|
9 702
|
10 151
|
7 931
|
|
Less adjustments
|
999
|
2 129
|
1 654
|
902
|
|
Total outlays
|
5 156
|
7 573
|
8 497
|
7 029
|
|
Staff years
|
35
|
n.a.
|
n.a.
|
33
|
n.a.: Not applicable.
Objectives, Performance Indicators and Results
Objective

To advise the Government on public international
law, and to ensure that the Government is kept fully informed
of Australia’s international legal rights and obligations. |
Indicator

The extent to which legal advice is delivered in a timely and
relevant manner. |
Throughout the year, the department sought to ensure that the Government
was provided with timely legal advice relevant to Australia’s foreign
and trade priorities, and kept fully informed of its international
legal rights and obligations. Some of the most significant issues
are detailed below.
Against the background of the dispute with Japan over unilateral fishing
in contravention of the Convention for the Conservation of Southern Bluefin
Tuna, the department delivered timely advice on that convention, the UN
Convention on the Law of the Sea and customary international law. This
advice led to compulsory proceedings against Japan in the International
Tribunal for the Law of the Sea. We also made a significant contribution
to the Government’s development of international regimes to promote the
sustainable management of valuable Patagonian toothfish and orange roughy
stocks, and to direct protection of these stocks where they were either
within, or straddling, the Australian Exclusive Economic Zone. Regular
advice was also provided to Australian negotiators on legal aspects of
21 bilateral air service agreements and other ongoing negotiations related
to social security, film, status of forces and space.
| Figure
30 |
International Legal Interests (1.8) Organisational Chart |

We gave urgent advice on a number of occasions to federal and State police
authorities on issues of consular and diplomatic privileges and immunities
affecting foreign missions and their personnel in Australia. We also provided
urgent advice on various aspects of the arrest and trial of CARE Australia
workers, Mr Steve Pratt and Mr Peter Wallace. In addition, the department
advised the Government on the possible establishment of an international
criminal tribunal for former members of the Khmer Rouge, to ensure that
the Government was informed of relevant legal considerations.
Indicator

Domestic implementation and compliance with United Nations Security
Council resolutions on sanctions. |
The department monitored the regulatory regimes required to implement
UN sanctions, and provided legal advice to business and Government
agencies on compliance with UN sanctions, including on the suspension
of sanctions against Libya.
Objective

To promote and develop global and regional respect for
international legal regimes, and to promote and protect Australian
interests through these regimes. |
Indicator

Achievement of positions that advance or safeguard Australian interests
in ongoing legal negotiations in multilateral forums on
matters such as fisheries management and enforcement, peaceful use
of nuclear technology, human rights, refugee law, criminal law (including
the International Criminal Court) and environmental protection. |
We made an effective and influential contribution to negotiations
on the establishment of an International Criminal Court, culminating
in the adoption of a statute at the diplomatic conference held in Rome
in July 1998, at which Mr Downer delivered the opening address. Australia,
through the department, chaired a like-minded group of countries with
the specific purpose of strengthening the international humanitarian law
regime. The adoption of the statute fulfilled one of the Government’s
prime multilateral and human rights objectives. We are continuing to play
an active role in the follow-up to the Rome Conference in the Preparatory
Commission, which is mandated to work on the practical arrangements for
the establishment of the court.
The department contributed to the UN negotiations for the development
of Conventions for the Suppression of Terrorist Financing and Nuclear
Terrorism, and sponsored specific provisions to address particular
regional concerns. While the text on Nuclear Terrorism is not yet finalised,
Australia’s proposals have received substantial support and influenced
the negotiating process.
We undertook extensive public consultations pursuant to our reporting
obligations under the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial
Discrimination. The report on this matter will be lodged with the convention
committee in July 1999.
The development of stronger protective mechanisms to prevent the involvement
of children in armed conflict and the sexual exploitation of children
have also been a focus of the department. Negotiations on two optional
protocols to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on these
issues are currently deadlocked. During the year, we played a leading
role in seeking a resolution of outstanding issues with the aim of
concluding negotiations by 2000. We also participated in the development
of an Australian Action Plan to ensure national implementation of global
standards agreed at the World Congress Against the Commercial Sexual Exploitation
of Children.

- During the year, we were involved in long and complex negotiations
to finalise the statute to set up an International Criminal Court. The
photo shows Australian delegation members (from left) Attorney-General’s
Department representative Ms Indira Rosenthal, Department of Foreign
Affairs and Trade representative Ms Cate Steains and NSW State Representative
Ms Helen Brady at the Diplomatic Conference on the Establishment
of an International Criminal Court in Rome in July 1998. This was
one of the many international legal negotiations we undertook in close
collaboration with key stakeholders, including State and Territory governments
and other government agencies.
Indicator

The degree of effectiveness in supporting Australian bilateral
trade and investment, and the negotiation of investment promotion
and protection agreements and other relevant legal instruments. |
On behalf of the Government, the department concluded the negotiation
of investment promotion and protection agreements with Slovakia, Lithuania
and India. We are also involved in the negotiation of 14 bilateral
double tax agreements, and have provided advice on the formation of the
Government’s forward program of double tax agreements.
Indicator

Outcomes of the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on
Narcotic Drugs, the UN Crimes Commission and other relevant international
forums that advance Australia’s interests in drugs, people trafficking,
money laundering and other organised crime issues. |
We have continued to play an influential role in the development of
a Convention against Transnational Organised Crime and, in particular,
its associated protocols on migrant smuggling, trafficking in persons
(with a special focus on women and children) and illicit trafficking in
and manufacturing of firearms. We expect that negotiations on the convention
and protocols will be finalised by late 2000.
The department has used multilateral forums to establish mechanisms for
the development of an international consensus to broaden legal cooperation
on money laundering beyond the proceeds of drug-related crimes to
all serious crimes.
Indicator

The degree to which the provisions of the UN Convention on the
Law of the Sea are accepted internationally and to which the institutions
established under it (the International Seabed Authority, the International
Tribunal for the Law of the Sea, and the Commission on the Limits
of the Continental Shelf) are cost-effective and reflect Australian
interests. |
The department is the chair of the Interdepartmental Committee on
the Law of the Sea. In this function we played a key coordinating,
negotiating and representational role in the development of international
and regional institutions relevant to the definition and protection of
Australia’s extensive maritime rights and interests. These interests include
sustainable exploitation, conservation and management of the mineral and
living resources of the sea and seabed. In the May 1999 meeting of State
parties and at other meetings, we argued successfully for limits on budgetary
increases for institutions established under the UN Convention on the
Law of the Sea.
Indicator

The extent to which outcomes acceptable to Australia are reached on
the designation of Indonesia’s archipelagic sealanes in the International
Maritime Organization, and from discussions with Indonesia on
enhanced procedures to control illegal fishing in the Australian Exclusive
Economic Zone. |
Recognition of Australia’s transit rights through Indonesian archipelagic
sealanes has been strengthened in keeping with Australia’s commercial
and security interests, and the implementation of measures to protect
Australia’s sovereign rights in its exclusive economic zone enhanced.
Objective

To promote Australia’s bilateral and multilateral interests
through treaties, and to provide the Government,
Parliament, States and Territories and the wider Australian community
with comprehensive information and advice on Australia’s treaty network. |
Indicator

Client satisfaction with the quality of advice provided on treaty
issues, including transparency, consultative arrangements and
flow of information on treaty action to the Government, Parliament,
the States and Territories and the wider Australian public (including
through seminars, publications and the Internet). |
The Government’s commitment to maintain transparent consultative arrangements
for treaty action was supported by the department through
public consultations and through assistance for the work of the Joint
Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCOT). Five presentations on the treaty-making
process were given to groups of senior State government officials and
private sector representatives. We also provided key speakers for the
JSCOT Treaties Seminar of June 1999, attended by 80 members of the public.
Outcomes from the treaties process included the tabling of 16 treaties
through the Parliament, resulting in 11 hearings and seven reports
by the Joint Standing Committee on Treaties.
In conjunction with the Attorney-General’s Department, we conducted
a review of the reformed treaty-making process introduced in 1996.
We received 66 submissions in relation to this review. The overwhelming
majority of these submissions concluded that the reforms had been well
implemented and effective in enhancing both the openness and the transparency
of the process.
In conjunction with the Australasian Law Information Institute, we continued
the development of a treaties Internet database (constituting the Australian
Treaties Library). This database is now the world’s most
advanced online national treaty information system, already containing
the equivalent of more than 26 000 pages of treaty texts. It has
been enthusiastically endorsed by users, including State governments,
members of Parliament, the legal profession, libraries, academics and
the general public.
Objective

To provide advice on domestic and administrative law relevant
to the operation and management of overseas posts and of the portfolio
domestically. |
Indicator

Smooth transition by the portfolio to the new public service
administrative law regime, as measured by the degree of awareness
of its requirements throughout the organisation and reduced risk of
grievances and litigation. |
Through the Workplace Relations Committee, the department has ensured
that employees are informed of legal issues relevant to their employment,
including aspects of the Certified Agreement, Australian Workplace Agreements
and issues relating to fixed and short-term employment.
Indicator

Client feedback on legal advice provided to the portfolio
on administrative and domestic law matters, including matters
arising from the implementation of the DFAT Certified Agreement 1998–2000,
new public sector employment legislation and regulations, and general
contractual responsibilities. |
The department implemented Government competition policy through
the selection of a panel of private legal service providers. Positive
feedback has been received via panel members on its commercial focus and
timeliness.
We responded to over 50 requests from law firms seeking information
on the taking of evidence overseas for legal proceedings. We also handled
more than 280 cases in relation to private legal proceedings involving
arrangements for service of legal documents through diplomatic channels.
The legislation process for all portfolio-related bills has also been
managed effectively. The Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty
Act 1998 was assented to on 2 July 1998. The Anti-Personnel Landmines
Convention Act was assented to on 14 January 1999 and has been proclaimed
to commence on 1 July 1999.
|