|
Preparation for the introduction of the Commonwealth’s first accrual
budget in 1999–2000 was a significant preoccupation for the department
during the period under review. The department responded professionally
to this challenge, recognising the potential benefits of drawing a clearer
link between resources and objectives. Like other agencies, the department
developed a set of planned outcomes (the intended results for the
community of the Government’s work) and outputs (services delivered
by the department to, and on behalf of, the Government). We then created
a framework of performance indicators in accordance with the accrual
guidelines.
The Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade operates in a context that
is significantly outside its control: the international environment is
uncertain, and Australia is only one of many players on the world scene.
This made it challenging to develop meaningful performance indicators
to gauge progress towards the achievement of planned outcomes.
We decided to include milestones in the Portfolio Budget Statements
1999-2000 that would represent the achievement of, or significant
steps towards, major goals in 1999–2000, taking considerable care to ensure
that these were forward-looking and realistic, and that they could be
reported against in the annual report for 1999–2000 in clear terms. The
department also provided supplementary information to the Senate Foreign
Affairs, Defence and Trade Legislation Committee to assist its scrutiny
of the department’s approach to internal management.
In preparing the annual report for 1998–99—the year of transition to
accrual budgeting—the department sought to benefit from the lessons learnt
in developing this first accrual framework, and reviewed the way our performance
indicators were expressed in the Portfolio Budget Statements 1998–1999.
While some amendments were made to these indicators, there were natural
limits to this exercise, given that the department had not had systems
in place during the year for the collection of accrual performance information.
The intention, however, was to provide a solid foundation for a report
which, to the extent possible in an international context, provides information
focused on results. We also began the work of establishing systems to
ensure that posts, divisions, and State and Territory offices were able
to meet the accrual budgeting data collection requirements in 1999–2000.
With the introduction of a new financial management system, the department
began to develop systems for addressing the new cash management requirements
associated with accrual budgeting. Given the international nature of the
department’s operations, we decided to centralise assets management
in Canberra in order to meet these new requirements more effectively and
efficiently.
| Figure
3 |
Outcomes and Output Groups |

| Table
10 |
Relationship between Programs and Outcomes/Outputs |
 |
Program Management Budgeting
|
Accrual Budgeting
|
 |
|
Program 1
International Relations, Trade and Business Liaison
|
Outcome 1
Australia’s national interests protected and advanced through contributions
to international security, national economic and trade performance
and global cooperation
|
|
Sub-programs
1.1 Interests in North Asia
1.2 Interests in South and South-East Asia
1.3 Interests in the Americas and Europe
1.4 Interests in the South Pacific, Africa and the Middle East
1.5 Multilateral Trade Policy and Negotiations
1.6 Trade Strategy Development and Business Liaison
1.7 Global Issues
1.8 International Legal Issues
|
Output Groups
1.1 Protection and advancement of Australia’s international interests
through the diplomatic network and Canberra-based activity
1.2 Provision of policy advice and analysis to portfolio ministers
|
| |
Outcome 3
Public understanding in Australia and overseas of Australia’s foreign
and trade policy and a positive image of Australia internationally
|
|
Sub-program
1.9 Information and Cultural Relations
|
Output Group
3.1 Public information services and public diplomacy
|
 |
|
Program 2
Passport and Consular Services
|
Outcome 2
Australians informed about and provided access to consular and
passport services in Australia and overseas
|
|
Sub-programs
2.1 Passport Services
2.2 Consular Services
|
Output Group
2.1 Consular and passport services
|
 |
|
Program 3
Services for Other Agencies
|
Outcome 1
Australia’s national interests protected and advanced through contributions
to international security, national economic and trade performance
and global cooperation
|
|
Sub-programs
3.1 Services to Parliament, the Media and the Public
3.3 Services to Australian Government Agencies Overseas
|
Output Group
1.4 International services to other agencies in Australia and overseas
|
|
Sub-program
3.2 Services to Foreign Representatives in Australia
|
Output Group
1.5 Services to diplomatic and consular representatives in Australia
|
| |
Outcome 3
Public understanding in Australia and overseas of Australia’s foreign
and trade policy and a positive image of Australia internationally
|
|
Sub-program
3.1 Services to Parliament, the Media and the Public
|
Output Group
3.1 Public information services and public diplomacy
|
 |
|
Program 4
Secure Government Communications and Security Services
|
Outcome 1
Australia’s national interests protected and advanced through contributions
to international security, national economic and trade performance
and global cooperation
|
|
Sub-programs
4.1 Australian Diplomatic Communications Network
4.2 Security Services
|
Output Group
1.3 Secure Government communications and security of overseas missions
|
 |
|
Program 5
Executive and DFAT Corporate Services
|
Enabling Services
|
|
Sub-programs
5.1 Executive Direction
5.2 DFAT Corporate Services
|
Enabling services
|
|