Australia-Korea: Strengthened Economic Partnership
Strategic Market Assessment
This chapter examines the overall attractiveness of the Korean market for Australian business and Australia’s competitive position. The major challenge for Australia is a relatively low profile compared with other countries. Australia’s major competitive position has been in mineral and agricultural products. There is an emerging Australian competitiveness in the technology and infrastructure sectors — the sectors where the Australian profile has been lowest.
3.1. Attractiveness of Korean Market for Australian Business
The Korean market is positive for most Australian goods and services (including technology). Except for the special circumstances of 1998, the market has been growing steadily and even the slowdown in 1998 did not affect Australia to any significant extent because of the predominance of mineral and agricultural products in Australia’s export profile. The market will remain attractive for the mineral suppliers, but may not continue to grow as fast as Korea places less emphasis on heavy industry. The ongoing liberalisation of trade in agricultural products should provide expanding opportunities.
In terms of the market characteristics of Korea for the manufacturing and services sectors, businesses consulted during the project were mainly positive:
- One small sized exporter of food processing equipment said the market in Korea is not large but provided steady sales. In its case the market is very clearly defined and there are no equivalent substitutes at this stage. A supplier of software that is used by the traditional Korean textile industry to move into high value added textile products expressed similar sentiments.
- One medium sized exporter of software to the banking industry has had good sales to Korea, but has satisfied most of the original demand and is now moving to new markets while maintaining existing customers. These new markets include new types of financial institutions (e.g. mortgage brokers) that are emerging in Korea as a result of financial deregulation and other countries. A similar situation applies with another software supplier.
- In the automotive components industry, the Korean market is growing steadily among automotive manufacturers within Korea and Korean automotive subsidiaries in third countries.
- There is a growing demand for professional services as evidenced by the work obtained by some Australian firms.
- There are many opportunities in the infrastructure/utilities sector, which may be enhanced as Australian financial institutions and professional services providers are involved in advising on new financing arrangements and ownership structures.
- The Korean Government’s strategy for Korea to become an important scientific and technological nation indicates a growing market for technology in the form of exports of products incorporating high technology or of intellectual property and know-how. This should also mean an expanding market in education and especially training in the application of such technologies.
- In addition the national framework for human resources developed in Korea is presently being reviewed with positive implications for Australian education and training (especially the higher education sector) as discussed later in this report.
The competitiveness conditions within Korea are a challenge. In some industries such as electrical and electronics manufacturing, Korea is very competitive and at present there is little Korean interest in importing. Even with the successful companies in the software and professional services industry, there is always the potential of competition from suppliers in third countries such as the USA, Europe or Japan and from within Korea. The successful Australian companies in this area have in most cases developed a niche that is large enough for their purposes but is small enough not to attract major attention from other potential suppliers. Another approach is to have a product that is always ahead of any potential competitor. Nevertheless, competition from these other countries is always present because Australian companies do not have the same general high technology brand recognition as companies from, for example, the USA (Nearly every company consulted in the manufacturing and services sectors commented on the very little understanding that most Koreans had of the manufacturing and technological capabilities of Australia. This was also a theme that was raised by many Koreans). While the distribution system in Korea is sometimes considered to be a challenge (and probably is in some industries such as agricultural products), it has not been raised as an issue by the companies consulted in the manufacturing and services sectors. One comment did indicate a competitive advantage for Australia in the automotive components area in that Korean companies preferred to buy from Australian suppliers rather than Korean subsidiaries of European companies because of: (1) Australian products were cheaper and better quality, (2) access to advanced technology, and (3) the export credits generated under the Automotive Competitiveness and Investment Scheme (ACIS).
An important issue that normally arises in considering a country’s attractiveness is the financial and economic conditions of doing business in that country. This covers items such as pricing and payment terms, tariffs and other barriers to entry, and foreign exchange conditions. While tariffs and non-tariff barriers are an issue in some areas such as agriculture, the manufacturing and services companies consulted have not raised any items in this area as being of particular concern.
However, legislative and socio-political conditions have been raised on a few occasions:
- The Australian telecommunications equipment industry has raised the difficulties companies in that industry are confronted with in Korea (and many other Asian countries) in respect of the regulatory and approvals process, particularly the over-elaborate compliance regime. The process is costly, time-consuming, and requires a lot of documentation compared with other developed countries.
- Another company was able to work its way through the regulatory process, but commented on the very high costs incurred on legal and accounting fees to gain an understanding of what is required.
- Nearly all companies commented on the difference in Korean and Australian cultures, particularly in the way of doing business. Having made those comments, the successful companies went on to say that, as long as one understood and basically accepted the need to do business in a different way, the challenge could be overcome.
- None of the manufacturing and services companies consulted had been confronted in recent years with particular foreign investment barriers nor with labour problems within Korea (The only comments in this context were with the lack up-to-date skills of Korean workers in some areas of manufacturing (automotive components). While this labour issue was not raised by any of the Australian companies consulted, some Australian companies are confronted with this issue). There are investment barriers at present in the way of overseas-owned education and training establishments.
- Many firms commented on the intellectual property issue (It is understood that Korea has legislation that appears in the first instance to provide adequate protection. However, the legal process apparently does not involve the “discovery” process, which allows a claimant to ascertain what has really happened in the way of an infringement). The successful companies usually found a way around this perceived weakness in Korea, for example, doing business with larger companies that had assets in third countries such as the USA which could be pursued in the event of any significant breach of their intellectual property rights. During the consultation process, a few companies were encountered that were reluctant to do business in Korea because of their fears about intellectual property infringement.
3.2. Australian Competitiveness
Overall Australian industry is competitive. This is most obvious in the areas of mineral and agricultural products where Australian producers can match most competitors. It is also applicable in many areas of the manufacturing and services sectors, especially where production does not require high volume lower quality products.
In terms of supply expertise of the Australian manufacturing and services sectors:
- The Senior Vice President of Hyundai Motor Company has acknowledged that Australian automotive component manufacturers have excellent fundamentals and that Australia in particular has price competitiveness in the aluminium and magnesium castings areas (Dr Hyun Soon-lee at the Federation of Automotive Products Manufacturers Convention (FAPM) Convention, 4 May 2000. He said that Korean automotive makers are pushing forward the development of aluminium and magnesium parts to reduce weight. Korea hopes to cooperate with Australia to develop an Aluminium Space Frame and Magnesium Seat Frame. The Korean industry expects to employ Australia’s excellent techniques and low cost basic materials with Korean production engineering). The scale required by the Korean automotive industry suits Australian suppliers — 100/150,000 units per annum rather than two million per annum. If large-scale production is required, it would be better to produce in the market with the ongoing R&D being done in Australia.
- One small sized exporter of food processing equipment said that its prices/costs are not an issue in Korea. At this stage its capacity is adequate but increased worldwide sales may require an increase in capacity. Although the company is located in a regional area distant from the capital cities, its relatively high value product has so far meant that the cost and physical delivery is not an issue.
- Australian professional services providers (e.g. legal, accounting) are cost effective compared with the USA and UK.
- In terms of technology capability, this is the strongest area of Australian competitiveness:
- Access to technology seems to be the driving force for Korea in the automotive components area. Korea does not want to rely on technologies from Japan, USA and Germany, but prefers to obtain if possible from Australia, especially light alloys where Australia is the technology leader as well as being the cheapest. FAPM has a general Memorandum of Understanding for cooperation with the Korea Automotive Industries Cooperative Association, including exchanges of technical information. FAPM also signed on 23 March 2001 an agreement for mutual cooperation with the Korea Automotive Technology Institute for the promotion of jointly funded cooperative R&D projects.
- Similarly, an Australian automotive components company, which has invested in Korea, has said that the only Australian it has working in Korea is a Quality Manager so as to raise the quality standards in Korea so that exports to Japan from Korea can become possible. The company also said that its major challenge with its Korean subsidiary was putting in best practice management practices and systems — where it used Australian expertise.
- The Korean Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade has proposed that Korea should pursue technological cooperation with Australia in the development of new lighter materials for automobiles and in technological cooperation among automotive components suppliers (Byoung-jun Song, Director of the Manufacturing Industries Analysis Division of KIET, in a paper dated 9 November 2000 on Industrial Cooperation in the Automotive Industry Korea/Australia).
- Technology and innovation is the major strength of the small sized exporter of food processing equipment previously mentioned. It is the international leader in its field and continually undertakes R&D to maintain its leading edge position.
- The objective of the investment of the Anam Industries group in Semiconductor Technologies Australia Pty Ltd is to link Australian strengths in intellectual property in software design with Korean skills in manufacturing and marketing. Australia is regarded as being very strong in software and systems development, which is a strong point for developing synergy between Australian and Korean IT companies.
- A Korean working in Australia for an IT company said that, although Australian technology is excellent, most Koreans are not aware of Australia’s high IT standards.
- There is already some collaboration with Australia in computer games technology although some individual Korean firms do not believe they need access to overseas technology.
- The successful software exporters to Korea that were consulted had technology that was leading edge and there was little other competition.
- In terms of marketing ability, the successful manufacturing and services companies are obviously doing the right thing. The major limiting factor is the issue raised in the paragraph on competitiveness conditions in the section on Attractiveness of Korean Market for Australian Business, namely, Australia’s lack of a general high technology brand recognition. While individual companies can do so much to advertise and promote their own image and reputation, it will continue to be an uphill task for individual companies if Australia as a nation does not have that image and reputation. Other potential areas for improving marketing ability include:
- Encouraging investment (including intra industry investment) in Korea and Australia, i.e. Korea investing in upstream activities in Australia with Australian investment in downstream activities in Korea. The investment in Korea usually brings the Australian supplier much closer to the ultimate customer. Such investment need not just be in traditional industries but also in high technology areas where the upstream activities are the R&D in Australia with manufacturing (particularly large scale) and marketing in Korea.
- Australian companies using Korea as the base to develop markets in neighbouring Asian countries, particularly China and Japan.
- Building on the relationships Australia has built up with resources purchasers such as POSCO and KEPCO. Some of the people in the Korean companies in resources areas know Australia well and have moved on to senior management positions in other parts of the companies — or they could provide introductions to people in the new areas of interest.
The issue of management capability (e.g. span of contacts/alliances in Korea, effectiveness of government and other Australian institutional support) has not arisen. Clearly, having a presence in the market is an important key to success as is strong support from Australian Governments. The only comment that has direct relevance was an Australian company that originally had difficulty in raising finance for its investment in Korea — however, the funds were ultimately raised.
CASE STUDY: Semiconductor Technologies Australia Pty Ltd (STA)STA believes Asia will become an important strategic region in terms of its business operations not only because Asia is the largest consumer and processing centre of downstream semiconductor products, but also because Asia will inevitably emerge as a centre of original and proprietary upstream technologies including design architecture, semiconductor processing and manufacturing. The self-feeding vertical integration in Asia will only intensify as disposable income levels and spending power rise rapidly in other countries in the region. STA’s marketing strategy includes using Korea as a springboard to penetrate into China and Taiwan and then into more sophisticated markets such as Japan. STA was established in 1997 to create a world-class semiconductor design centre in Melbourne. It is a wholly owned subsidiary of Korean semiconductor company Acqutek and operates as a fabless (non-chip manufacturing) semiconductor design company whose primary business is developing semiconductor IP ("Intellectual Property") in its own state-of-the-art semiconductor ("chip") design technology. The company also contracts semiconductor design services for third parties, markets EDA tools and related training and third party products and arranges for the fabrication of the chips it designs from competitive, available fabrication companies in Korea, Taiwan and the USA. STA was one of the initial sponsors of the Victorian Government CHIPSKILLS program, providing semiconductor design skills development programs via training courses and support. The CHIPSKILLS program has been implemented at the RMIT University, Swinburne University of Technology, Victoria University of Technology, Latrobe University, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology TAFE, Boxhill Institute of TAFE, Western Melbourne Institute of TAFE and Barton Institute of TAFE. The company’s genesis goes back to the Korean semiconductor packaging group Anam Industries formed in 1965. Anam Industries progressively grew to become the world’s largest contract packager of semiconductors. In 1985 the Group created Anam Semiconductor & Design Co. Ltd (Anam S&D) (later renamed Anam Semiconductor & Technology, Anam S&T and then later again Acqutek Co. Ltd) as Korea’s first semiconductor design house. In 1994 Anam S&T formed a wholly owned subsidiary in Australia, Anam Technology Pty Ltd. In 1995 Anam Technology Pty Ltd created a wholly owned subsidiary ASIC Australia Pty Ltd, later renamed Semiconductor Technologies Australia Pty Ltd in 1997. STA moved to operational mode in December 1997, with its first staff uptake of six engineers joining in early 1998. The early period of STA principally involved the training of its newly recruited engineers in the use of the complex design tools involved in designing, simulation testing and laying out integrated circuits. Marketing activities then commenced leading to the first contract design and chip supply contracts from the biggest toy manufacturer in Korea. In late 2000 work commenced on the ‘Combo’ chip for powerline communications. Also in late 2000 Anam Technology Pty Ltd was consolidated into STA and work commenced on the establishment of the SWIP chip IP licensing portal. Based on the company’s existing depth of expertise in semiconductor design, it is planned to operate a B2B Internet Portal chip design IP licensing service called SWIP which will access semiconductor design IP created by STA and strategic alliance partner organisations in Korea, China, and Taiwan. The IP comprises libraries of reusable functional circuit core designs for integrated circuits ("IC’s"). These reusable cores form the building blocks for systems-on-chip ("SOC") solutions and are licensed to major systems houses, chip makers, design centres and major IC distributors. The company is building a sound revenue and profit growth potential, moving from its establishment phase to a projected positive cashflow in 2001/2. The initial revenue is generated principally from world wide sales of chips currently in the final stage of development by the company and the licensing of semiconductor IP through SWIP. Source: Mr Stephen Kim, Managing Director, Semiconductor Technologies of Australia Pty Ltd |
< Australia
and Korea — The Background
Industry
Sectoral Issues >
Local Date: Saturday, 21-Nov-2009 22:43:00 EST
This page last modified: Thursday, 15-Jan-2004 14:37:49 EST
